About Me

Name: Jimcason
Location: Homer, LA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Energy Crises or Fantastic Opportunity?

8-11-08

RE: Energy Crises

What a fantastic opportunity to solve three problems we have which are:

The energy crises.

The transfer of American’s wealth to other and mostly unfriendly nations.

By retaining the profits from mineral exploitation on Federal lands, we could pay significant funds against the National Debt, particularily the Social Security Trust Fund liability.

Adding well-paid jobs in America.

I have never been an advocate of Federal management of any endeavor, but contracting out the discovery, drilling, and completion of oil and gas deposits on Federal Lands to experts without political overhead being added, and then operating the fields with a competitive bidding process we could capture the tremendous profits resulting for the Federal Deficit.

It hinges on some simple concepts:

The deposits are in Federal lands. Therefore, they belong to the American people.

The marginal cost of producing one more barrel of oil from a producing field on land is appx. $1.50, while off shore it cannot be that much greater.

The significant cost is in exploration and development of a new field.

Current technology has taken much of the guesswork out of the decision to drill on a prospect.

No longer is the price of oil a ‘free-market’ price.

 

What I propose then, is that legislation be introduced to enable the Federal Government to locate and develop these prospects rather than the old method of leasing them out to some Company.

This way, the Federal Government could capture all the profits on these deposits and I further propose that the profits be used to fund alternative energy research and to fully fund the Social Security Trust Fund. I would hope that agreement could be reached to prevent using these profits to increase Federal expenditures until such time as the National Debt is eliminated.

A critical path some mention is the currently unavailable off-shore drilling rigs. If Congress would refer to Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress could determine that the first punishment of the illegal cartel of OPEC would be to cancel all their contracts with American off-shore drillers and bring them back home.

If and while I have your attention, I wanted to offer an insight I have to the future…the population of the World is beginning to tax the available resources of Earth. One can see the trend-taking place among markets, that capitalist allocations of resources are losing ground to Nationalism.

Yes, oil is the current dilemma and actually could have been prevented in Congress had been more far-sighted than they were. But still the day would have come.

Next will be food and water. Furthermore, we are approaching or already in the days when allocation by price alone is not a just allocation method. Somebody above my pay grade should begin to work on this coming situation.

What is interesting to note is how lucky America is. We really do have an abundance of fossil fuels, plenty of great agricultural land and plenty of water (somebody did decide to take a lot of agricultural land out of production for some reason and we need to start thinking of how best to get it back into production). While remembering the lessons of The White Men’s Burden experienced in India by England, I don’t think we would be good Christians if we allow other people’s to starve when we insisted in returning available land to a natural state of chaos based on somebody’s near-sighted conjecture of what is the best course of action.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE MOTIVES OF NANCY AND HARRY-----

IT IS BECOMING VERY OBVIOUS THAT THE REAL MOTIVES OF NANCY PELOSI AND HARRY REID AND COMPANY ARE TO TANK THIS ECONOMY FULLY TO CAUSE US TO VOTE IN OBAMA.

WE ARE NEARLY A YEAR NOW INTO THE MORTGAGE CRISIS, NOW SPREAD TO THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
A.  CREDIT CRISIS
B.  HOUSING CRISIS
C.  STOCK MARKET TRAIN-WRECK
D.  OIL AND ENERGY CRISIS
E.  CONSUMER DISPOSABLE INCOME CRISIS
F.  LOOMING SMALL BUSINESS OWNER CRISIS

YET TOTAL CONGRESSIONAL INACTION AND IN FACT, A RECESS WHEN THE REPUBLICAN'S PROPOSED ACTION AND NO RECESS. 

ARE WE THAT STUPID THAT THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH MAKING US ALL SUFFER FOR THEIR POLITICAL GAIN?

AND WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT OBAMA'S DEBTS THAT WILL DEFEAT THE PROMISE TO CHANGE THINGS?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congressional Sins

Article I, Section 8 of the US Constitution gives the Congress the power of: Defining and Punishing Piracies and Felonies committed on the high seas, and OFFENSES AGAINST THE LAW OF NATIONS.

Yet the Congress has yet to act (since at least 1974) against the Oil Cartel (OPEC) as an illegal restraint of trade.

There are those that process a belief in free trade.  But in the case of China, which managed their currency to be undervalued against the US Dollar by about 40%, isn't that also an artificial restraint of free trade by definition?  Who did it damage?  American workers as they lost jobs to the Chinese and Chinese workers who were paid in an undervalued currency.

I would call that an offense against the law of nations in that the currency was 'managed' and there never was any 'free trade' by definition.

Who was hurt by this failure of Congress to act?  By now, nearly all American Companies have built new modern factories in China and trained their workers in best practices while America's resources have become aged and discouraged.

On the other hand, who benefited?  Obviously Chinese infrastructure, obviously by the Middle East, obviously by politicians in America who cling to their jobs for perhaps not-so-obvious reasons. 

We, the people have become complacent.  Every two years there is an election in the fall and we now accept the fact that Congress will steer clear for that year of doing the people's business so they can get re-elected. 

So, in conclusion, have the people become complacent or has Congress become complacent?

My vote is 12 years maximum term limits so Congress has less desire to make it a career and instead represent us for a change, and with no pension.

My final comment here is we will not probably get a vote on these issues and since our Constitution was written in the days of horse-back riding and originally required Congress to meet in Early December to avoid the flooded rivers, the only revision I know of is that Congress can meet later now due to our bridges, air travel, internet, telephone, etc.  Time for a change? 

Let the people vote as it is their government of laws and taxes.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »